Mr Raab wrote a statement in the preamble of a six-monthly document that covered events in Hong Kong from July to December last year. In the document’s introduction he argued the proposed law could put at risk the “one country, two systems” system and increased the chanced of prosecution in Hong Kong over political crimes.
But in a statement published on Friday morning, the Hong Kong government called the document “inaccurate and biased”, and a government spokesman said conjecture that the legislation would undermine Hong Kong’s assets was “alarmist”.
“We firmly oppose and express deep regret over the report’s inaccurate and biased remarks on the national security law and the high degree of autonomy enjoyed by the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region,” the statement read.
The government said it was “absolutely wrong and totally groundless” for the report to imply the implementation of the national security legislation was directly contradictory with Article 23 of the Basic Law, in which Hong Kong was allowed to constitute national security law.
“It does not preclude the central authorities from legislating at a state level for national security,” the spokesman said.
“Any allegation that the law will undermine Hong Kong people’s freedoms and ‘one country, two systems’ is no more than alarmist speculation and simply fallacious.”
Speaking about the anti-government demonstrations that arose in Hong Kong a year ago, Mr Raab said: “The UK has been consistently clear that violence and vandalism from protesters is unacceptable.
“The way through the current situation in Hong Kong is clear: all sides must invest in dialogue and reconciliation, underpinned by a robust, independent inquiry.”
Last month, the NPC, China’s top lawmaking body, authorised a motion allowing its standing committee to create new laws for Hong Kong to ban activities related to secession, subversion, terrorism and foreign infusion in the Hong Kong’s affairs.
Since China outlined the move on May 21, Mr Raab and his American, Canadian and Australian counterparts have issued two joint statements.
The papers argued that the direct implementation of national security laws would curb the city’s residents’ freedoms.
China and Hong Kong authorities said the new legislation would help calming the unrest the territory and would not breach the freedoms of the vast majority of citizens.
But Mr Raab stated in the report on Thursday that the solution to the city’s discord and its fundamental roots must come from Hong Kong and “cannot be imposed from mainland China”.
#Multiple #Language #Support